WASHINGTON — After the Supreme Court’s landmark 2004 ruling that Guantánamo Bay prisoners could file lawsuits challenging their indefinite detention, the federal public defender in the District of Columbia took on several such cases and assigned a young lawyer in his office to handle them: Ketanji Brown Jackson.“They involved very complex legal issues that were just being worked out and it needed someone who was incredibly bright and an incredibly good lawyer,” recalled the public defender, A.J. Kramer. “We thought Ketanji was the best fit.”Ms. Jackson, who went on to become a federal trial judge and then an appeals court judge, is now President Biden’s Supreme Court nominee. But her two and a half years as an assistant public defender, including her work on behalf of accused terrorists and of criminal defendants, is likely to receive particular scrutiny under the glare of her coming confirmation fight.Lawyers who harbor ambitions to be a judge — as she clearly did, having written in her high school yearbook that a judgeship was her goal — typically serve as prosecutors who help put criminals in prison. If confirmed, Judge Jackson would be the modern court’s first justice with experience as a public defender.She has also had to navigate the politics of having represented unpopular clients. At her confirmation to be a district court judge in 2012, for example, Senator Charles E. Grassley, Republican of Iowa, challenged her about her Guantánamo work, saying her record raised “some concern about how you will handle terrorism cases that may come before you.”Ms. Jackson assured Mr. Grassley that she believed that terrorists posed a danger to the United States and that the country was at war with them, while distancing herself from the Guantánamo cases she had worked on.“In all of those situations, the views that were expressed were the views of my clients that I represented,” she told him, adding, “The briefs did not necessarily represent my personal views with regard to the war on terror or anything else.”Judge Jackson has deep roots in thinking about criminal law from multiple perspectives. One of her uncles was sentenced to life in prison on cocaine charges. But another was Miami’s chief of police, a third uncle was a sex crimes detective, and her brother worked as a police officer in Baltimore — before he took a job as an investigator in the same federal public defender’s office where she had mostly handled appeals, Mr. Kramer said.As an undergraduate at Harvard, she wrote a senior thesis in 1992 titled “The Hand of Oppression: Plea Bargaining Processes and the Coercion of Criminal Defendants.”After graduating from Harvard Law School, clerking for several judges — including Justice Stephen G. Breyer, the man she would succeed — and practicing corporate law, Ms. Jackson spent several years as a lawyer for the United States Sentencing Commission.There, she later wrote, she came to realize that she “lacked a practical understanding of the actual workings of the federal criminal justice system, and I decided that serving ‘in the trenches,’ so to speak, would be helpful.” She thought the public defender’s office would provide that knowledge while also being “an opportunity to help people in need, and to promote core constitutional values.”Mr. Kramer, who interviewed her for that job, recalled that her previous role at the Sentencing Commission had focused on a “data-driven and numbers-crunching” approach to the criminal justice system.“She clearly wanted to see how the system worked in actuality, and was more interested in the defense side of trying to help people who came from very unfortunate backgrounds,” he said. “And it also gave her a chance, I think, to work with human beings involved in the system.”ImageIf confirmed to the Supreme Court, Judge Jackson would be the only sitting justice with experience as a public defender.Credit...Erin Schaff/The New York TimesJudge Jackson served as a public defender from February 2005 until June 2007, before returning to corporate law. In a Senate questionnaire for her first judicial nomination, in 2012, Judge Jackson said that as a public defender, she had argued before the appeals court about 10 times.One of her cases involved a man named Andrew J. Littlejohn III, who had been convicted of unlawfully possessing a firearm as a felon after the police found a gun hidden in a laundry basket while searching the house where he lived with his mother. Ms. Jackson appealed his conviction on several grounds, including because the trial judge had asked potential jurors questions in a way that could have masked whether some had relatives who were police officers and might be biased.In a unanimous ruling, a three-judge panel agreed that the juror questioning had been flawedBy: Charlie Savage
Title: As a Public Defender, Supreme Court Nominee Helped Clients Others Avoided
Sourced From: www.nytimes.com/2022/02/26/us/politics/ketanji-brown-jackson-supreme-court.html
Published Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2022 16:40:55 +0000
Read More
Did you miss our previous article...
https://badpoliticians.com/us-politics/trump-praises-putin-binding-republicans
UK PoliticsWorld PoliticsVideosPrivacy PolicyTerms And Conditions
